Earlier in 2018, Jack Ma, Alibaba's billionaire
founder, got me wondering about his theology when, in announcing his retirement
from the giant ICT corporation said, "God didn't create human beings to
work, but to enjoy the world's abundant wealth...". I couldn't stop
wondering about where he got the fanciful idea from. But when I reflected on
the theological history of Asia, I wondered less. Indeed, persons with little
or no theological training, in spite of their worldly successes, must restrain
themselves from making public utterances about God and His mysterious works.
Jack Ma's unfounded remark reminded me of another presumptuous remark by the
flamboyant Esama of Benin kingdom, Chief Gabriel Igbinedion, during one
of his birthday celebrations. The irrepressible chief, rather flippantly, told
his guests that the reason God created man on the last day of Creation was to
allow enough time for crops to grow!!! His guests, among them senior clergy
men, women and university dons, were expectedly in stitches.
But Jack Ma's remark wasn't as hilarious, it was a
fundamental distortion of theology; and I hope he would, or be caused to
correct himself in the near future. Though I do not hold a certificate in
theology, but I have read enough of the holy books to know that God's purpose
is for man to be a co-creator - a fellow indefatigable worker. Man's measure of
success is therefore to be inseparable from his co-creatorship with God. In a
nutshell, man's enjoyment is to be derived from his creative works. In that
sense, it is troubling to hear a decided workaholic like Alibaba's
founder suggest, at the sunset of his illustrious career, that man was created
solely to luxuriate in Nature's many riches. If this erroneous declaration by
China's richest man is considered in the light of his country's rapidly rising
global influence, I see the need to purposefully correct that potentially
damaging casual remark.
Ma's remark is perhaps a wake-up call to shorn humans'
spiritual purpose of avoidable
obfuscations. Critically analyzed, such obfuscations could be said to
the reason religious conflicts in particular, and wars in general proliferate
across the globe. Consider what positive impact it would make if it were
clearly etched in the human mind that creative productivity is the more
credible worship mode of God than the essentially ceremonial form. The New
Testament Gospels specifically made the point: humans' creative potentials are
God's principal investment from which huge returns are expected. St. Augustine
of Hippo, the 4th century theologian, among notable others, had subsequently
written copiously about that proposition, culminating in his magnum opus:
The City of God.
Fourteen centuries later, that
treatise literally brought forth the Enlightenment Philosophers, whose
works methodically led to the overthrow of monarchical governments in Europe.
By making the citizens' work a form of worship of the Creator, their spiritual
and civic duties are optimally reconciled, the citizens' loyalty to the
sovereign is thereby guaranteed, these philosophers had postulated. The logic
of the proposition is simply palpable.
Although St. Augustine's and the Enlightenment
philosophers' works greatly influenced the development of world philosophy,
regrettably, however, British eighteenth century colonialism and the United
States of America's post-World War II foreign policy completely missed The
City of God's crucial message. Instead of looking to their populations
and local resources to build their respective economies, the British and the US
(and to a less degree, other European nations) aggressively pursued foreign
campaigns through which the peoples and resources of weaker nations (notably
Africa) were captured and employed to build and maintain their mega economies.
After the British and other leading nations relinquished their colonial
holdings, colonialism was surreptitiously substituted with neocolonialism,
through opaque financial, economic and trading policies. Thus, while the
developed nations maximally exploited the peoples and resources of developing
countries, their own populations and resources were barely productively active
and redundant respectively. That was a ticking time bomb waiting to go off - a la the idle mind...
The 2008 financial collapse acted as a trigger for that
bomb, which finally exploded in 2016 in what is now infamously referred to populism,
the most potent contagion of the modern age. The barely productive indigenous
populations of developed nations are now remonstrating generations of
underutilization of their creative potential; these huge populations have been
left out of the global wealth creating loop. This is the only objective
interpretation of populism in the 21st century. While the respective
establishments of the United Kingdom and the US kept their greedy eyes peeled
for exploiting the peoples and resources in distant countries Brexitism and
Trumpism happened under their insensitive nostrils. And as the feeble-voiced
head of the UK belatedly learned about the 2008 financial debacle, no one saw
the 2016 dual events coming, of course. Two years after the fact, leading
politicians in both the UK and the US have yet to fully come to terms, let
alone come up with appropriate responses to Brexitism and Trumpism
respectively. Rather than look critically hither, they as yet look through a
film darkly thither, lamely blaming Russian meddling in their respective
domestic affairs. This is no more than making escapism an art form. We needn't
look beyond the previous US midterm elections results and the UK's blunderings
with Brexit to be convinced that Brexitism and Trumpism were
domestically-induced. The Democrats didn't take the US senate, preparatory to
trumping Trumpism as had been widely speculated. Instead the Republicans
increased their majority in the upper chamber; and the much talked about Brexit
deal with the European Union recedes by the week, even as the 29 March 2019
exit date looms large. Right Honourable Congress and British Parliament, please
stop the ongoing political poppycock otherwise known as Russian meddling. Stop
looking to justify that allegation for, as the US special counsel, Robert
Mueller has since discovered, the evidence of it is a will-o'-the wisp. The
answers to your teeming challenges reside in optimal exploitation of your local
populations and domestic resources, consistent with Nature and the Holy Writ.
Thankfully, emerging populist leaders:
Donald Trump of the US; Vladimir Putin of Russia; Viktor Orban of Hungary;
Recep Erdogan of Turkey; Narendra Modi of India; and President-elect Jair
Bolsonaro of Brazil, are blazing that trail. These are simply responding to the
dictates of the times. Pity though the reactionary media have quickly branded
them as retrogressive nativists, but there is no doubting the fact that time
will vindicate their bold initiative, as it ultimately does all truths.
Meanwhile, Jack Ma's country, under the prodding of maximum ruler Xi Jinping,
is pursuing a one trillion US dollars "One road, one belt"
global project that would, in less than a century hence, as likely make
Brexitism and Trumpism pale into insignificance in terms of politico-economic
upheavals. Ma, Jinping and other similarly oriented persons should be offered
crash programmes on history and theology to hedge the world from the risks of
an amplified version of the emerging consequences of neocolonialism.
Afam Nkemdiche is an engineering
consultant; December, 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment