By Bayo Ogunmupe
The Future of Nigeria is a historical analysis of the nation called
the Federal Republic of Nigeria. A book written by Michael Owhoko, a
middle aged Nigerian who has seen and witnessed how Army Officers
truncated Nigeria's transformation from geographical expression to a
prosperous and united nation state. Ever since the British created
Nigeria in 1914 from communities with differing backgrounds, the nation
has been wracked by problems. The Nigerian civil war fought from 1967 to
1970 is just an example of the violence that has bedeviled the nation.
With the Nigerian people issuing a sustained call for change, it is
clear that the people are not satisfied with the current system of
government.
As the Federal Attorney
General's opposition to Operation Amotekun indicate, Nigerian leaders
have not responded to the discontent in the land. They have not seen the
need for holding a referendum to decide the fate of the country, an
outcome that would have served them better. Author Owhoko maintains that
a referendum must be conducted if Nigeria has any chance of stepping
away from the precipice of disintegration. According to Owhoko, with a
referendum, the government would not only make headway on overcoming the
challenges, but it will regain the trust and confidence of the people.
The Future of Nigeria is in paperback, it has 112 pages, published in
2018 by Book Venture Company LLC, Ishpeming, United States. The book
was first published with the title: Nigeria on the Precipice: Issues,
Options and Solutions. It had to be rebranded into the new title because
of the upsurge of additional information. It has nine chapters, a
preface, an introduction, a conclusion and Endnotes of four pages.
Indeed, the future of Nigeria is predicated on various factors among
which are: history, culture, belief systems; the system of government,
sincerity of purpose, judicial system, and political ideology. How these
factors are administered within the context of equity and justice will
determine the future of the country. As a multiethnic and diverse
cultural society; this heterogeneous nature of the nation makes Nigeria
eminently qualified for true federalism like in Germany, Canada and the
United States.
I am splitting this nine
chapter book into three. In reviewing the first three chapters as
section one; we're concerned with the historical development of Nigeria,
the federal system as an acceptable contractual system of government
and the introduction of the present unitary system as the origin of
Nigeria's problems. As noted earlier, the complexity of the entity
called Nigeria is a product of incompatible behavioral patterns induced
by powerful cultural elements. Of these elements, ethnicity and religion
constitute the clog in the country's progress. Those elements shape and
influence opinion and impact negatively on the decision making process
at all levels in Nigeria till today. Consequently, as the various
ethnic groups struggle to live harmoniously with one another, the more
it becomes clearer that the cultural and religious differences
constitute challenges to national harmony and peaceful coexistence in
the country.
These differences more than
other considerations are responsible for the retardation of development
in the country despite the enormous financial resources available to
the nation. This makes Nigeria a country where citizens, including the
political class, work at cross purposes- even where it is glaringly
evident that their positions are inimical to the general good of the
country. In the Nigerian reality what keeps manifesting in every sphere
of life is insincerity both in the practice of religion and politics.
Even, the National Youth Service Corps, a mandatory one year programme
designed and introduced by the Federal Government to engender national
integration among Nigerians, hasn't been able to achieve its objective.
Paradoxically, rather than foster unity, the programme has become an
albatross, creating awareness of the deep animosity and incompatibility
of the various ethnic nationalities owing to the cultural differences in
the polity.
Manifestations of these
untoward behaviors emerge during interactions at various geographical
areas of deployment and assignments where Youth Corpers, as participants
are fondly called, have first hand experience of segregation going on
in the country. With the exposure of this well educated class of
Nigerian youth to this distrustful process, the country risks a bleak
future. This situation is particularly intractable when attempts to
reengineer a restructured federation, aimed at removing threats to
unity. fail due to sabotage from entrenched interests benefiting the
status quo. As things stand in Nigeria now, the federation isn't
working. making it impossible for the country to attain her full
potential. Unless we act with courage and discuss frankly the basis for
our continuous existence as a nation state, we may as well prepare for
the dismemberment of the Nigerian federation.
The federal system of government bequeathed to us by the British and
which we operated in the first republic fitted perfectly into Nigeria's
diverse cultural and ethnic composition. "There was a considerable level
of autonomy amongst the regions, with both the regions and centre
deriving their powers from the constitution. The powers, duties and
responsibilities were clearly spelt out under the exclusive, concurrent
and residual lists in the constitution. This is the essence of
federalism, where there is a clear sphere of constitutional scope of
operations for each of the federating units and the centre."
"Were it not for the coup of 1966, when the military struck and
altered that system of government, Nigeria would have transformed and
grown into an enviable polity amongst its peers on the African continent
and in the world. The federal constitutional arrangement at the time
tacitly encouraged each region to develop at its own capacity." The
second section is as interesting as the first if not more. Led by the
challenge of petroleum resources, the prospects from solid minerals and
the rise of agitation over the neglect of the oil producing areas.
Paradoxically, the Niger Delta region from which oil is produced and
which plays host to various oil companies, isn't accorded the required
attention commensurate to its contribution to the economy. And this is
all the more important due to environment degradation caused by oil
exploration. Thus, the neglect of the oil producing environment caused
the inhabitants of these areas to press special funds for the oil
spillage bedeviling these communities.
Thus, militancy emerged as a result of frustration in the Niger Delta.
The demands and suggestions from the Niger Delta people that are at
variance with the ruling majority group are usually viewed as
unpatriotic, selfish and subversive. They don't see anything wrong in
using the resources from the Niger Delta to develop the rest of the
country, despite the subsisting precedent where 50 percent derivation
was applied to natural resources found in territories occupied by the
majority ethnic groups. The Future of Nigeria is so interesting that
space isn't enough to make a total review without leaving new facts to
discover yourself. Michael Owhoko, the author is an authority on
Nigerian politics and society in the post colonial era. He is from the
oil producing Delta state. A media and public relations practitioner,
Owhoko has worked in banking, oil and gas and in the media. he earned
his degrees in political science and mass communication and is the
publisher of an online newspaper: www.mediaissuesng.com. He is the
author of four other books on politics, oil and gas and feminism.
No comments:
Post a Comment