By Umair Haque 
There’s
 probably nothing, and I mean nothing, more bizarre, foolish, and inane 
in all the world today than American political discourse. A set
 of pundits — 100% white elites, of course — who can barely handle 
discussing college level American style liberalism versus conservatism 
suddenly find themselves having to do justice to socialism, Marxism, 
fascism, Nazism, authoritarianism, kleptocracy, and more. They’re so 
badly out of their depth it’d be a little like asking Tucker Carlson to 
defend a PhD thesis on the Hegelian dialectics of fake news. The result 
is a discourse full of every kind of egregious, sophomoric, half-witted,
 brain-dead straw-man, fallacy, error, and just downright ignorance 
known to humankind.
Let’s
 clear some of that up, shall we? I’m going to start simple, and build 
up slowly to what I think are three crucial points — that nobody, 
really, in American discourse seems the slightest bit aware of, 
concerned with, or even able to understand. So skip ahead if you want 
the good stuff.
Nobody’s bringing full socialism anywhere, especially America.
 Nobody — except maybe fringe leftists — is discussing 100% state 
ownership and central planning. Yet, just the other day, I read three 
articles arguing vehemently against just such a flaming straw man (all 
by panicked white dudes). Relax, Tucker. No one’s coming to communalize 
your Ford F-150.
“Socialism” doesn’t mean everything in the economy is socialized.
 In the same way as when I say “capitalism”, it doesn’t mean “every 
single thing in the economy or society is privately owned, run for 
profit, and capitalized by joint-stock companies, right down to 
people” — just that some things are — so “socialism” doesn’t mean what 
Americans equate it to: every last thing being state owned and centrally
 planned. Americans have forgotten that the 100% part is 
“totalitarianism”. There are many kinds of economies that are part 
socialism, part capitalism, and part neither. “Socialism” doesn’t even 
mean “some central planning and state ownership”, really. How can that 
be?
“State
 ownership” and “central planning” are ideas from 1950s economics, my 
friends — and anyone that still uses them is still fighting a Cold War 
that both American and Russia ended up losing. You should ask 
them what century it is now. What do you think every corporation in the 
world does? Central planning. Who do you think owns things that are 
owned by “the state”? In a democracy, you do. So these terms — which 
were created in the Cold War era — hide more than they reveal and 
illuminate. The idea that markets will ever exist without “central 
planning” is impossible, pure fiction. As is the idea that everything in
 a democracy can ever be purely “privately” owned — from parks to 
hospitals to schools. These stone age ideas are keeping Americans in the
 dark.
21st
 century “socialism” is made of genuinely democratic mechanisms of 
governance, ownership, and purpose, which are far more sophisticated, 
flexible, and innovative than capitalism’s by now — it’s not the 
Politburo, and this isn’t 1962. “Socialism” today looks 
like this: public goods like healthcare, education, and media are often 
best structured as corporations which are publicly owned by communities,
 not “shareholders”, which maximize real human benefits, not just 
“financial profits” — whose boards consist not just of “owners”, which 
end up being hedge fund managers, mostly, but living members of the 
communities they serve. The NHS is set up as a series of interlinked 
trusts. Who owns them? Communities do, under a type of public corporate 
ownership. If you don’t think your HMO “plans”, just as the NHS does, 
you’re living in fantasyland. The difference is that your HMO plans for 
its bottom line, and couldn’t care less whether or not you live or 
die — but the NHS plans to transform people’s health, and its board 
members, who aren’t just tuned-out corporate exeuctives ordering another
 yacht on their iPhones, but people from all walks of life, govern it. 
In the same way, in Germany, union members sit on company boards. The 
examples are endless.
These
 are historic ideas and great innovations Europeans have 
pioneered — which Americans are totally unaware of. They make up what 
American thought all too casually, without often really understanding 
it, call “social democracy” — supposing that it’s something from the 
1890s, or 1960s. It’s not. It has evolved to become a far more 
sophisticated, powerful, flexible, and stable set of institutions and 
systems than capitalism, which stopped evolving long ago — more so if, 
that is, how well people live is what you care about, not just how rich 
corporations get.
Social democracy has created the most successful societies in all of human history, period, full stop. By a very, very long way. With record speed. Whenever
 American pundits talk about socialism, they talk about Venezuela. Chill
 out, Nixon. Nobody’s suggesting America turn into Venezuela. Instead, 
something more like, say Spain. Until 1975, Spain was a broken 
country — a military dictatorship. Today, it’s more vastly successful 
than America in every conceivable way, at least for human beings. 
Spaniards live five years longer,
 they’re happier, they’re not suicidally depressed, they have better 
relationships, they have more leisure time, their incomes haven’t 
flatlined for decades, they retire in peace, and generally, all that 
makes them pretty chilled out, content, warm, kind people. Do you see 
what a remarkable, stunning achievement that is in just forty years? That’s not even a single human lifetime. History’s never really seen anything like the power of social democracy.
Social
 democracy is the most powerful, stable, and efficient engine of human 
progress we know of. Much, much more so than capitalism. It’s like cold fusion compared to an internal combustion engine.
 America? Life is going backwards — at record speed. Life expectancy 
falling by a year — every year. Middle class imploding. Young people who
 can’t afford to have families, kids, homes. Old people living in their 
cars and working at Walmart. If you buy the line that “capitalism’s the 
greatest engine of progress we know of!”, at this point, my friend, 
grin, because you are a fool. The grim reality of modern day America is 
vivid proof that it’s more like a decrepit, smoke-belching engine that 
regularly catches fire, and when it does, it burns the whole 
neighborhood down.
(No,
 the world didn’t rise because of “capitalism” — don’t be ridiculous. 
The world rose because the World Bank and UN among other international 
bodies — socialism! — deliberately targeted reductions in poverty, 
mortality, and so forth, and achieved them, by investing in things like 
schools, hospitals, vaccination, pipes, and sewers. Not by building 
Walmarts.)
Scandinavia.
 Canada. Europe. Social democracy, wherever it’s been tried, in mature 
societies, has been not just a stunning success — but history’s greatest
 socioeconomic success, ever, period, almost overnight. It’s something 
as transformative as the discovery of antibiotics — but multiplied by 
orders of magnitude. American pundits can’t bear to talk about it, 
probably because their bloated, swollen egos would go “pop!”, and so 
would their paychecks. Yet the simple fact is this. People live the 
longest, happiest, richest, safest lives they have ever lived, period, full stop, in the history of the world, under social democracy. By a long, long way.
And
 that’s in just a few decades. It has a great deal to do with social 
democracy synthesizing the best of both capitalism and socialism, but 
this essay’s too long by now. Unfortunately for Europeans, America’s 
main exports now are hate, ignorance, and spite, so many Europeans are 
buying into American myths that backwards is better. It’s not. Let me 
put that to you another way.
We have the formula for human prosperity. America just doesn’t want to apply it. I
 won’t say that Americans are dumb — but they’re sure not being very 
smart. If you had, before you, something like the magic formula that 
societies had been looking for centuries — wouldn’t you use it?
 Not Americans. Oh no. Anything but that. After all, then the most 
exceptional and special and wonderful country in all the world would 
have to admit…maybe it wasn’t. Maybe it never needed to be, at all. 
Maybe no one does. Just a place of humility, empathy, courage, grace, 
and truth. All the qualities of adulthood. Am I being mean? Oh no, Umair
 called us names. Sorry guys. Time to grow up.
What’s
 America really doing these days? It’s busy not learning a thing from 
history, the world, or reality. Which, at this point, seems to about all
 it’s capable of. But I guess that part’s up to you.
Umair
August 2018
August 2018

No comments:
Post a Comment